tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post6440624214903808427..comments2024-03-27T02:10:46.586-04:00Comments on The Influence Peddler: Iraq: What if the Democrats Get Their WishThe Editor at IPhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07271471626482554372noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post-33037556220693549432007-02-19T23:30:00.000-05:002007-02-19T23:30:00.000-05:00Wow. This all seems familiar Mr. Editor."Withdrawi...Wow. This all seems familiar Mr. Editor.<BR/><BR/>"Withdrawing would mean that the Syrians, Iranians and the Saudis would be drawn into an insurgentcy that they are less financially prepared to prop up and would be more dangerous for them. "<BR/><BR/>No. They are there now assisting the insurgency, they needn't be drawn into the fight. It's dangerous for Iran, Syria and the Saudis, because they Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post-72543083028595243102007-02-19T22:43:00.000-05:002007-02-19T22:43:00.000-05:00It is not that Iraq would be better off with Sadda...It is not that Iraq would be better off with Saddam In power it is that it would be better off if Iraqis had been the ones to topple him. <BR/><BR/>Your perspective is haunted by the fact that the Bush admins rush to war was a faulty decision. <BR/><BR/>Answer me this though. How is stabilizing a region to avoid it devolving into a wider conflict to the advantage of the US. Withdrawing would meanJG Hitzerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15882547412751105828noreply@blogger.com