tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post6912520078698291946..comments2024-03-27T02:10:46.586-04:00Comments on The Influence Peddler: Greenwald On IraqThe Editor at IPhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07271471626482554372noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post-12513647693331680822007-08-15T14:56:00.000-04:002007-08-15T14:56:00.000-04:00Dear Editor at IP:Oh, by the way, do I have Murdoc...Dear Editor at IP:<BR/><BR/>Oh, by the way, do I have Murdoch's permission to log in and read the sacred script of the Weekly Standard?<BR/>You conservatives ONLY listen and respond civilly TO EACH OTHER. Sorry for dampening your party.<BR/>AnonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post-55512164188418188202007-08-15T14:52:00.000-04:002007-08-15T14:52:00.000-04:00"The Editor at IP"Wow. Sounds like such a prestigi..."The Editor at IP"<BR/>Wow. Sounds like such a prestigious title.<BR/>But it's just a masquerade for having NOTHING to say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post-1606741136054900542007-08-13T16:21:00.000-04:002007-08-13T16:21:00.000-04:00Wow. To regard Glenn Greenwald as a provider of r...Wow. To regard Glenn Greenwald as a provider of rigorous analysis is prima facie evidence that you lack any 'minimum IQ requirement' that may exist.<BR/><BR/>Greenwald's piece on O'Hanlon and Pollack is another example of his weak analysis, as the post above shows.<BR/><BR/>And if that's not proof enough for you, go over here as well:<BR/><BR/>http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2007/08/The Editor at IPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07271471626482554372noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post-25011076145750595292007-08-13T16:14:00.000-04:002007-08-13T16:14:00.000-04:00Mr. Spree:Ummmmm, or maybe: because you're a moron...Mr. Spree:<BR/><BR/>Ummmmm, or maybe: because you're a moron?<BR/><BR/>For your information, Mr. Greenwald directs his readers at the very start of his commentary to a posting of the entire interview. <BR/><BR/>Learn to read, then learn to recognize rigorous analysis when it's looking you in the face.<BR/><BR/>Or quit the propaganda game altogether.<BR/><BR/>There is after all a minimum IQ entry Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25554442.post-14736535162359638432007-08-13T15:08:00.000-04:002007-08-13T15:08:00.000-04:00ummmmm, because he is a moron?No joke. The guy is ...ummmmm, because he is a moron?<BR/><BR/>No joke. The guy is an absolute jerk.<BR/><BR/>He interviews one of the original op-ed writers in the NYT piece " A war we might win" (I think), yet he does not show the Q&A format, he chooses instead to give us HIS interpretations of the interview.<BR/><BR/>He is intellectually dishonest, a liar and I don't even bother reading him anymore because Susan Ducloshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01876090195787415266noreply@blogger.com